youth sports sexual abuse in Canada

Youth sports sexual abuse.

Seems like a societal sickness.  83 coaches in 4 years charged in Canada.  Questions are asked about. how government can put protections in place.  That is fine.  But what stops the organizations that fund and actively work with children doing something?  Like at minimum, no coach or adult is ever alone with a child and all adults have police record checks and training about what sexual predation is and the serious repercussions for a coach’s reputation.  Spend some monies (a few sports clubs together) and get advice (psychologists, police, etc).  Don’t wait for government:  get it done.

‘We have no choice but to make hard decisions’-The word on the Hill.

How to start?  Ah, let’s make it simple.  It is interesting that when that phrase is uttered it is not uttered to wealthy folk or corporations that make billions in revenue.

  1. The Republicans (and democrats in the past), cut taxes.  For whom you might ask?  For the massive corporations and the uber-wealthy. Not you.
  2. In 2017 the Republicans made cuts to corporations permanent but householder cuts will be reversed in 2027.
  3. And now, the Republicans are going to cut Medicare and Social Security.  Who is that going to affect the most, you might ask?  You, not them.
  4. Mr Bezos, Mr. Musk and Mr. Buffett paid federal taxes of 3.4% of $401 billion.  How much do you pay? The first paid less tax every year than a nurse or police officer.
  5. Good news:  200 millionaires at Davos last week urged the attendees to, “tax the ultra-rich” to help relieve the cost of living strain off ordinary households.”  Yay!  See how they make their point.

I don’t care how much money business people make, as long as they and their corporations pay a reasonable amount of tax.  Defining what ‘reasonable’ means cannot be left up to bought politicians and corporations or their owners.  Wider segments of a population need to have a say in what tax cuts do to them and the gap between those who make little in comparison to these others, as the junior Bush called them, ‘the have-mores’ needs to be lessened.  That would be a just outcome;  it might even prevent a revolution.

listen to Pink’s and Steve Mac’s brilliant, What about us? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_About_Us_(Pink_song)#:~:text=Gil%20Kaufman%20of%20Billboard%20shared,US%20government%20had%20failed%20people.

scraps from the rich man’s table

Oxfam Canada has produced an eye-watering and cardiac-causing Report called Survival of the Richest (January 2023). The report is detailed, factual and impossible to ignore, if one chooses to read it and let it soak in.  Also, see an article by Dr. Trevor Hancock about the same, who points out the numerous ways in which the wealthy, abetted by governments and helpful tax systems, pay less tax than the average nurse or teacher.  

For example. 1) “Top rates of tax on income have become lower and less progressive, with the average tax rate on the richest falling from 58% in 1980 to 42% more recently in OECD countries. Across 100 countries, the average rate is even lower, at 31% [p. 12].”  2) “…one of the richest men in history, Elon Musk, has been shown to pay a ‘true tax rate’ of 3.2%, while another of the richest billionaires, Jeff Bezos, pays less than 1%. [p. 12].”  3) “New Oxfam research also shows that the richest are key contributors to climate breakdown: a billionaire emits a million times more carbon than the average person, and billionaires are twice as likely as the average investor to invest in polluting industries like fossil fuels [p. 9].”

There is a large cadre of supporters who worship at the altar of the great (wealthy) man because either they are lieutenants or executives or third party supporters like tax accountants and lawyers.  And then there are, far removed from the holy space around the great man, the pundit whose motivation is ideological and therefore fundamentalist who are paid to help sell news so that they (both employer and pundit) can scrape off a few scraps that fall from the great man’s table.

The world does not have to be this way.  Indeed, between 1940-1980 the world was different.  The relative (especially in countries once called by the epithet, ‘third-world’) equality of wealth and opportunity between humans was reasonable.  

This relative equality was created by the main tool of progressive taxation (not, of course,  in every country).  Governments built up an educated citizenry and created a mutually supportive (risk spread among many to reduce the $$ cost for each) social structure that enabled more persons to be healthy and employable, thus strengthening democracy.  Progressive taxation, at the same time, allowed enough space to reward the genius of entrepreneurs and capacity to create profit for corporations without the disparity under which the world now functions, 

But for some folk the next dollar is the only thing that counts. The Report, as does Hancock’s article, argues that it is more than past time that governments bring back that nasty tool called progressive taxation.  This is not a new argument.  Other individuals and entities have called for the same.  This Report is not only well-written and readable, it is also full of detailed facts and numbers. It commands attention and calls for action. 

Most persons will not read it. Some feel despair and  find it easier to let inertia carry them along. The ‘polycrises’, as the Report names our global problems, are overwhelming. However, we peasants, far below the rich and powerful, can do more than sort our recycling. We can actively, on our own or with others, join (with other groups and individuals who have been fighting the good fight) to push governments to change tax policy.  The wealthiest individuals, and corporations will decry, denounce and (hopefully) despair, at this change.  They will portray themselves as unjustly treated.https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-budget-2022-bank-tax-1.6412530 Governments will baulk at upsetting their corporate connections.

So what?  To quote Hancock: “what’s not to like-unless you are a billionaire or millionaire lacking any form of social conscience?”

CBC NEWS: Canada’s richest CEOs have already earned the average worker’s annual salary

CBC NEWS: Canada’s richest CEOs have already earned the average worker’s annual salary

CBC NEWS: By 9:43 a.m.,January 2, 2023 Canada’s richest CEOs have already earned the average worker’s annual salary
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-richest-ceo-average-salary-1.6701407
Every year some folk seem to be surprised by this news.  The only surprise is how much greater is the spread between  these folk and most everyone else.  Analysts are trotted out to speak the usual words: companies need to pay more for the best talent.  This statement assumes that  CEOS all by themselves create the successes, or messes, of the companies they serve. That is not the case.  These folks have boards and executives to help in their success- or mess- making.  And every year CEOs and their executives tell each other they have done a very good job, and reward themselves accordingly. How they make those decisions on behalf of each other is never revealed of course.
Also, most persons  who have stock do not know that the salaries and options (etc) for these persons dilute the stocks they own.  While they are celebrating a few points up in their stocks, those holdings could have been higher if CEOs and their various lieutenants did not get paid such exorbitant remuneration.
Another way they get paid, and pay less tax at the same time, is that when a given company has a loss they can claim that loss on their taxes. And still get paid more.  So how much tax do these folk actually pay?
Another point.  How many $$$ is enough that one starts paying a reasonable tax to live in a country that is stable, safe and is run on the basis of the rule of law and the division of powers?  If one’s remuneration is large, their tax bill should be large-that is equity but it is also the necessity of supplementing Canada’s tax base so that we, together, can continue to have a country as described.
A last issue is how much the people in their companies actually get paid and how much tax they pay to support our country.  Is it just, or reasonable or financially justifiable that a few make eye watering salaries while others make so much less?  Nope.