This person, Kristi Noem: puppy killer, DEI hire. She’d never get a real job if she hadn’t acquired a taste for over-sugared Kool-Aid. What did she say about the second murder of an American citizen?
Oh, right; “The guy’s dead; the point is moot”. The point is moot. Which point was that? That you’ve assumed the guy had pulled his gun on the ICE bandits who were trained in a week, given a mask and a gun and sent out to terrorize citizens? Or was it that he didn’t have ID? Really? Did the bandits bother to ask the fellow for his ID? Not with them knocking him and others around. How would you know he did or did not have it? You’re blowing gas out your wazoo. Your private army -oops, Donnie’s private army – sanctified by the two-thirds corrupt supreme court and allowed by the House or Senate are a re-creation of the brown shirts; not patriots keeping Americans safe. Where’s the evidence that thousands of American citizens or others legally in the country are criminals, rapists and insane asylum escapees? Is there a set of data that in minute detail answers that question? No? What level of education do you have?
This is an important question because if you had any training in governance and leadership you would know the importance of facts verified by objective third parties, not by sycophantic MAGA hacks. If you can’t find the facts to back up your mere assertions, perhaps Patel or Homan or Bessant or Miller any of the other DEI hires can find the data. Oh, right: same warm Kool-aid and multiple layers of sycophantic handlers and optic creators.
“The guy’s dead: the point is moot.” This statement is indecent. One could say it’s wicked, evil (I know; these two words are the same, but why not emphasize the point?), sinful (that is, causing harm to humans) or one from the legal profession: torts. So, let’s just stick with the word ‘indecent’. It means, “grossly improper or offensive”.
How can this be a legitimate word to use in this context? Let’s look at the scene. The man is on the ground, with his phone in his hand, three or four of your bully boys are on top of him and then another buddy pulls out his gun and shoots him. How many times? Did you count them? Yes, indecent: an affront to law, faith and, yes, the rights of all humans to be treated with dignity under the rule of law and the separation of powers. I know of course that you and Donnie and his hires feel that these two concepts have had their day and its about time that the people who are strong should take what they wish and everyone else suffer what they must.
Do you even know that man’s name? Why didn’t you use it? By reducing him to ‘the guy’ erases his humanity, his essence, his being, a member of the human tribe. He becomes a thing, an ‘other’ who doesn’t deserve a name, or a history. His name was Alex Pretti, not ‘the guy’. And every single person you and you boys have taken off the streets, out of their homes, their offices, their schools, they all have names as well, but you don’t care about that. And that’s why you, and the entire edifice created by DDT is indecent and like all indecent and inhuman structures in history fail under the weight of their own corruption.
Oh, but my God! The killer was scared for this life! And needed to protect the citizens around them who were terrified! Right, like the guy that killed Ms. Good. Let’s recap: The ‘dead guy’ is on the ground with three or four or more of your people on top of him with his phone in his hand and one of them shoots while he is on the ground, defenceless, his hands and legs trapped by the other three or four or more brave patriots. This was simple rage and murder. And your flippant, callous ‘The guy’s dead; the point is moot,’ is indefensible, repugnant and indecent. Let’s see, a puppy and an American citizen. What is the difference between them? Apparently to you, nothing.
And what’s worse is that you and a number of these DEI hires say they are Christian. My dear woman: you are not. If anything, you are an apostate because you are acting against the implicit demands of the two greatest commandments. Know what those are? Ask a real Christian to look them up for you. Christians and decent people don’t do these acts. They do not order the kinds of behaviors that lead to extrajudicial killings. They don’t excuse the killers to protect their team against everyone else. They do not excuse them and they do not blame all immigrants for a country’s troubles, caused by their own wealthy elite. They do not avoid or denigrate facts from third parties that do not agree with their narrative. By the way, if you wear a cross, please take it off; that image is, at its purest, a symbol of compassion, saving and mercy. And exists to be emulated by those who say they are Christian. It is repugnant that you and others like you wear that symbol and yet cause enormous harm (sin) in the world.
“The guy’s dead; the point is moot.” You and the regime you support in your saviour worship of an another failed human is indecent. The mid-terms cannot come swiftly enough. There will be legal recompense for people like you.
I’ve got to say it again: My god! ‘The guy’s dead; the point is moot.’ Did I say yet that this statement is repugnant, indecent and abhorrent?
And he was shot 10 times. Then the boys came over, ripped up his shirt to count the holes. This is desecration of a human body, a crime/sin/violation in all civilized, sane countries in the world. By the way, that view about a dead person is a Judeo-Christian concept.